Around March last year, when Harshali Khandekar, senior program lead at Agastya Foundation, started work on a ‘Design Thinking’ project, she tried to put together a team of instructors that included both men and women. She had never been comfortable using tools when she was growing up—it always fell to her father to pick up tools and fix things—and wanted students to see women instructors handling tools as well so that they would be more comfortable and emulate them.
“In design thinking, you try and use whatever you know and apply that knowledge in bettering the situation around you. In this particular project, we had a set of tools, cutting and drilling tools, and digital tools like 3D printers and computers,” says Khandekar, who along with a colleague, first worked on developing the curriculum for the project for a month-and-a-half before they took it to schools. The idea, she adds, was to encourage children to start finding things that bother them about their surroundings, and come up with and build solutions from whatever material was at hand. Among other things, children transformed abandoned classrooms into lunch/garden/reading areas and built cycle stands, continuing to think about solutions long after the project had left the school.
Khandekar, who did her Masters in biotechnology , followed by a PhD at the Institute of Chemical Technology in Mumbai, joined Agastya Foundation three years ago since a corporate job didn’t appeal to her. “I wanted to work in education, especially with children in their foundation years, making science interesting for them,” she says. Agastya Foundation, which works on helping spark curiosity and nurture creativity through hands-on science education for poor rural children and teachers, fit the bill.
Ever since she joined, Khandekar kept herself open to ideas and learning, and with the design thinking project too, she ensured she kept the lines of communication with her team open. “I made sure we had constant dialogue… because there’s so much that I am going to get to learn from the field which I will never learn sitting in a science centre or an office,” she says. Considering the programme was in its first year, “we couldn’t miss even a simple observation”. It involved sitting together with the team every Saturday and letting people speak without interrupting them “or saying ‘hey, we have seen this before’ or whatever”.
The approach ensured it was not just the children who were empowered, but also the instructors. “We were never scared to speak up about the problems that arose,” says Jyoti Salunkhe, one of the instructors, “and solutions also came up easily.”